Equipment
Management Narrative
Overview of
Requirements
Federal grant regulations require that grant recipients establish
written policies and procedures for the management and control of equipment
acquired in whole or in part by Head Start grants and subgrants. Moreover, sound
business practice suggests that such policies and procedures should apply to
all the equipment acquired by the grantee agency, regardless of funding source.
Federal regulations define equipment as any tangible, non-expendable,
personal property charged directly to an award that has a useful life of more
than one year and an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit. However, each
grantee agency has the option of setting a more stringent or restrictive requirement
than that referenced in the Federal regulations. For example, while the Federal
regulations define equipment with reference to the $5,000 or more benchmark,
consistent with grantee policy, an agency may set a lower (more stringent) level,
such as $1,000.
When required for project activities, the cost of equipment
is an allowable expense if the ACF awarding agency has given prior approval.
Prior approval is necessary only for items of equipment that meet or exceed
the Federal acquisition cost level of $5,000. Grantee agencies do not need prior
approval to purchase items of equipment with an acquisition cost under this
threshold, even in situations where grantee agencies are using a more stringent
(i.e., lower) threshold.
The Federal requirements for equipment management are contained
in:
- 2 CFR 220 (Cost Principles for
Educational Institutions)
- 2 CFR 225 (Cost Principles for State,
Local and Indian Tribal Governments)
- 2 CFR 230 (Cost Principles for
Non-Profit Organizations)
- Head Start Act (Public Law 105-285)
- Head Start program regulations (45 CFR
Part 1301)
- The Departmental Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Awards and Subawards to Institutions of Higher
Education, Hospitals, Other Nonprofit Organizations (45 CFR Part 74).
- The Departmental Uniform
Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements to State and Local
Governments, including Indian Tribal Governments (45
CFR Part 92).
Federal regulations define what items are considered equipment items (as opposed
to supplies) and the requirements that must be met by grantee agencies that
acquire equipment with Federal funds. These regulations exist to provide the
Federal government with reasonable assurance that:
- Proper records are maintained for
equipment acquired with Federal awards.
- Equipment is adequately safeguarded and
maintained.
- Disposition and encumbrance of any
equipment is in accordance with Federal requirements.
- The Federal awarding agency is appropriately compensated for its share of any equipment sold or converted to non-Federal use.
To ensure compliance, the grantee agency should be fully committed
to providing proper oversight for property acquired with Federal funds. In order
to do that, there are certain activities that should be undertaken as part of
the grantee agency's overall responsibility. The grantee agency, for example,
should ensure that its accounting system separately identifies property acquired
wholly or partly with Federal funds and that there is an established channel
of communication for staff or any other person to report suspected improprieties
in the use or disposition of equipment. Also, agency managers should understand
the equipment-related Federal requirements and related fiscal operations so
that they can more easily spot potential areas of noncompliance.
With respect to equipment acquired wholly or partly with Head
Start funds, nonprofit grantee agencies must ensure that:
(45 CFR 74.34(f) or 45 CFR 92.32(d))
- Equipment is used in the program that
acquired it or, when appropriate, other Federal programs.
- Detailed equipment records are
maintained that are accurate and up-to-date.
- Property tags are placed on equipment.
- A physical inventory of equipment is
taken at least every two years.
- The inventory is reconciled to the
agency's equipment records.
- An effective control system is in place
to safeguard the equipment.
- Procedures are established to
adequately maintain the equipment in good working order.
- Proper sales procedures are used to
obtain the highest possible return when equipment is no longer needed.
- Procedures are established to ensure that the Federal awarding agency is appropriately reimbursed for dispositions of property acquired with Federal awards.
Grantee agencies should monitor the above activities by, for example, reviewing
the results of periodic equipment inventories and following-up on inventory
discrepancies. Also, agencies should periodically review the sale and disposal
of equipment that is no longer needed in order to ensure appropriate valuation
and reimbursement to the Federal awarding agency.

Clarifying
Definitions
Equipment is any article of tangible, nonexpendable,
personal property having a useful life of more than one year and an acquisition
cost of $5,000 or more per unit (45 CFR 74.2 or 45 CFR 92.3). This dollar figure is called the capitalization level or
threshold. Purchases of equipment above the capitalization threshold are often
referred to as capital expenditures or capital equipment items. All items with
an acquisition cost per unit less than the capitalization threshold are
considered supplies (unless the terms and conditions of the Federal award
specifically establishes a lower amount). In the case of nonprofit grantee
agency may use a lower capitalization level, provided it uses this limit
consistently on an organization-wide basis for the purpose of preparing the
agency's financial statement (45 CFR 74.34). Agencies governed by 45 CFR Part 92 (State, Local, and Tribal
governments grantees/organizations) may use their own definition of equipment
provided that the definition at least includes all equipment as defined above
(45 CFR 92.3). If a grantee agency chooses to
define equipment using a lower threshold, such as $1,000, then an item purchased
for $1,800 will appear as supplies for Federal purposes but as equipment in
the grantee agency's records. Moreover, this lower threshold should prevail
when guiding the grantee agency in its administration of equipment.
Federal regulations also distinguish between special-purpose
equipment and general-purpose equipment. However, in almost all cases, equipment
purchased with Head Start funds is considered general-purpose equipment because
special-purpose equipment means equipment that is used only for research, medical
or scientific purposes.
The acquisition cost per unit of equipment equals the
invoice purchase cost of that item minus any discounts. The unit cost may also
include the cost of modifications, attachments, accessories or auxiliary apparatus
that are needed to make the item of equipment usable for its acquired purpose.
Although Federal regulations state that other ancillary charges, such as taxes,
duty, in-transit insurance, freight, and installation can be included or excluded
based on the agency's established written accounting policies and procedures
(2 CFR 225, Appendix B (15)(B)(1)), these charges may need to be included in
order to be in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
GAAP requires that the cost of putting a fixed asset into use includes all costs
associated with the purchase, including freight, tax and installation.

Narrative
Equipment
purchases and prior approval for equipment purchases
Capital expenditures for general-purpose equipment
($5,000 or more) are unallowable as a direct cost except with the prior
approval of the Federal grant awarding office (2 CFR 230, Appendix B(15)(B)(1)).
For equipment purchases specifically included in the grantee agency's Financial
Assistance Award (FAA), prior approval is not necessary. Although grantees may
transfer funds between object class categories without prior approval (45 CFR
74.25 or 45 CFR 92.30), if the transferred funds will be used to buy equipment
with an acquisition cost of $5,000 or more per unit, the agency must first obtain
prior approval.
Prior approval consists of obtaining written permission by an
authorized grants office official in advance of an act that would result in the obligation or
expenditure of funds, where such approval is required. As provided in 45
CFR 74.25(k)
and 45 CFR 92.30(a)(1), all approval notifications
must be in writing and signed either by the Grants Officer, the ACF Regional
Administrator or the ACF Assistant Secretary. In situations where prior approval
by the Federal grant awarding office is not needed, grantee agencies should
still comply with their own internal approval process for equipment purchases.
Equipment should not be purchased simply to use an unobligated
balance remaining at the end of the budget period. Prior approval for equipment
purchases is required from the Federal grant awarding office regardless of when
in the budget period the purchase is considered. However, all charges to the
grant must be allowable and allocable as a direct cost to
the grant, and be reasonable and necessary for the conduct
of grant activities.
Although equipment may be purchased with prior approval any
time during the budget period, sound budget and financial management practices
will eliminate the need to rush purchases at the end of the year. Also, as part
of routine audit procedures, auditors may examine the level of spending during
the last quarter to establish whether the grant was sufficiently managed from
a financial standpoint throughout the year.
Ownership or transfer of ownership
The title to equipment acquired with
Federal funds vests in the organization that received the Federal assistance
award directly from the Federal awarding agency to carry out program activities,
subject to certain restrictions (45 CFR 74.34(a)
or 45 CFR 92.32(a)). When a grantee agency's grant
budget includes equipment, title vests in the grantee agency. Similarly, when
a subgrantee's budget includes equipment, title vests in the subgrantee. Determining
who has title to equipment therefore depends on whose grant or subgrant account
was used to acquire it.
The Federal awarding agency has the right
to require that equipment (including title) purchased with grant funds be
transferred to the Federal government or an eligible third party named by the
Federal awarding office (45 CFR 74.34(h)
or 45 CFR 92.32(g)).
Insuring equipment
Grant recipients are expected to provide the same insurance
coverage for equipment acquired with Head Start funds as for other equipment
bought using the agency's own funds. The cost of insuring equipment is an allowable
expense. Insurance costs may be allocated as a direct cost if the cost can be
associated with a direct program expense (e.g., insurance for Head Start buses),
or it may be included in the organization's indirect cost base.
Control system safeguarding equipment
For Federally owned equipment, or equipment acquired with Federal
funds, grantee agencies must ensure that (45 CFR 74.34(f) or 45 CFR 92.32(d)):
- Equipment records are maintained
accurately.
- Equipment owned by the government is
identified and appropriately described.
- A physical inventory of equipment is
taken and reconciled with equipment records at least every two years.
- An internal control system is
maintained to insure safeguards to prevent loss, damage, or theft of
equipment.
- Adequate maintenance procedures are in place to keep the equipment in good working order.
To ensure these requirements are met, grant recipients should maintain an equipment
management system. The foundation of such a system may be a computerized database
of all equipment for which the grantee agency has inventory and reporting responsibility.
The record for each item of equipment in this system must contain the following
information: (45 CFR 74.34(f)(1) or 45 CFR 92.32(d)(1))
- Identification: Description, model number, and
manufacturer's serial number or other identification number.
- Location: Location and condition of the equipment,
and the date the information was reported.
- Award:
Source (sponsoring agency), including award number, whether title vests in the
grantee or the Federal government, and the percentage of Federal participation
in the cost of the equipment.
- Acquisition, use and inventory: Date acquired or received, unit acquisition cost, and
percentage of Federal participation in the cost.
- Disposal: Date of disposal, reason, sales price, and method used to determine current fair market price (where the grantee agency compensates the ACF awarding agency for its share)
An agency's equipment management system also may record financial
accounting data, such as useful life and book value.
At least once every two years, a physical inventory of all equipment
must be conducted. While taking the inventory, the continued need for the equipment
should be verified. Items in the biennial inventory should be compared to those
shown in the agency's accounting records (or equipment management database).
To facilitate this process, the grantee agency should reconcile information
in the equipment management system with the general ledger for all equipment
acquisitions. Any differences between the inventory and the accounting/equipment
database should be investigated.
Grantee agencies should have an established mechanism for reporting
and investigating damaged, lost or stolen equipment. If damage, loss or theft
occurs despite the fact that the grantee has the required control system in
place, there will be no obligation to the Federal awarding agency for the equipment,
unless the grantee agency receives compensation for the damage, loss, or theft
from insurance or some other source. If the grantee agency is compensated for
the damage, loss or theft, but does not replace the equipment for use by the
program, the regulations regarding sale of equipment apply (45 CFR 74.34(f)(6)
or 45 CFR 92.32(e)).
Nonprofit grantee agencies have an obligation to investigate
and fully document any loss, damage or theft of equipment. If the government
owned the equipment, the Federal grant awarding office should be notified promptly
(45 CFR 74.34(f)(4)). A State will manage equipment acquired under a grant by
the State in accordance with State laws and procedures (45 CFR 92.32(b)). Other
grantees subject to 45 CFR Part 92 shall investigate any loss, damage or theft
of equipment (45 CFR 92.32(d)(3)).
Use of equipment
Grant recipients hold title and shall use the equipment in
the program as long as needed, whether or not the program continues to be supported
by Federal funds. However, the grantee must not encumber the property without
approval of the Federal grant awarding agency.
Grant recipients may use equipment acquired with Head Start
funds to provide services to non-Federal organizations. However, for as long
as the Federal government retains an interest in the equipment, grantee agencies
are specifically prohibited from doing so for a fee that is less than private
companies charge for equivalent services (unless specifically authorized by
Federal statute) (45 CFR 74.34(b)(1) or 45 CFR 92.32(c)(3)). Any such user charges will accrue as program income and
must be reported as such on the Financial
Status Report (SF 269)
(45 CFR 74.24 or 45 CFR 92.25).
When no longer needed for the original program, grantee agencies
shall use the equipment in connection with its other federally sponsored activities,
if any, in the following priority order:
- Programs, projects or activities
sponsored by the HHS awarding agency.
- Programs, projects or activities
sponsored by other HHS awarding agencies.
- Programs, projects or activities sponsored by other Federal agencies.
If the grantee agency no longer needs the equipment for the
above purposes, it may retain the equipment for other uses provided
that compensation is made to the original Federal awarding agency or its successor
(see the section below on Equipment disposal or sale).
Equipment repair or replacement
Grantee agencies are expected to care for the equipment in their
custody and keep the equipment in good working order. Basic maintenance procedures
include ensuring that warranty cards are returned and that regular or periodic
maintenance is scheduled and conducted. Records should be kept of any deficiencies
discovered as a result of inspections, as well as any maintenance actions performed.
Repair costs may not be included as an equipment cost
(or treated as a capital expenditure) unless (2 CFR 230, Appendix B(27) or 2
CFR 225, Appendix B(25)),
- The repair will appreciably prolong
the item's intended life.
- The repair adds to the permanent value of the item.
When acquiring replacement equipment, grantee agencies, with
the written approval of the Federal awarding agency, may use the equipment that
will be replaced as trade-in, or sell the equipment, and use the proceeds to
offset the costs of the replacement equipment (45 CFR 74.34(d) or 45 CFR 92.32(c)(4)).
When trading-in or selling equipment, the grant recipient should provide for
competition to the extent practicable in order to obtain the maximum possible
proceeds from the trade-in or re-sale (45 CFR 74.34(f)(6) or 45 CFR 92.32(e)).
Equipment disposal or sale
If a grant recipient has no further need for equipment with
a current per unit fair market value of $5,000 or more, nonprofit agencies must
request disposition instructions from the Federal grant awarding office (45
CFR 74.34(g)). The awarding agency must issue such instructions no later than
120 days after receiving the agency's request. There is no requirement under
45 CFR Part 74 for items of equipment with a current market value below $5,000.
For agencies subject to 45 CFR Part 92 (grants awarded to State, local, and
Indian tribal governments), items of equipment with a current per unit fair
market value of less than $5,000 may be retained, sold or otherwise disposed
of with no further obligations to the awarding agency (45 CFR 92.32(e)(1)).
Among these same agencies, items of equipment with a current per unit fair market
value in excess of $5,000 may be retained or sold. However, in these circumstances,
the awarding agency has the right to an amount equal to the current market value
or proceeds from the sale multiplied by the awarding agency's share of the equipment
(45 CFR 92.32(e)(2)).
The records for equipment acquired with Federal funds should
be retained for three years after final disposal 45
CFR 74.53(b)(2) or 45 CFR 92.42(c)(2)).
The scenarios below illustrate how grant recipients in nonprofit
organizations will be reimbursed in different situations for costs associated
with the disposal of equipment that is no longer needed 45
CFR 74.34(g)).
Scenario 1
The nonprofit grantee agency is instructed to sell the equipment;
or The nonprofit grantee agency does not receive disposition instructions
within 120 calendar days of the request:
- Establish the proceeds from the sale.
- Multiply the sale proceeds by the percentage of the Federal share of the
original cost. The agency may retain the lower of either:
- $500, or
- 10 percent of the sale proceeds (i.e., the proceeds due to the Federal
awarding agency)
Scenario 2
The nonprofit grantee agency is instructed to ship the
equipment elsewhere:
The agency may retain the current fair market value of the equipment
multiplied by your agency's percentage share of the original cost plus reasonable
shipping or interim storage costs
Scenario 3
The nonprofit grantee agency is instructed to otherwise
dispose of the equipment (e.g., have it hauled away):
The agency will be reimbursed for reasonable costs incurred
in disposing of the equipment.

Audit Requirements
In the area of equipment management, an annual external audit
may have the following objectives:
- To obtain an understanding of the
agency's internal control, and to test its internal control.
- To determine whether the agency
maintains proper records for equipment and adequately safeguards and maintains
equipment.
- To determine whether the disposition or encumbrance of any equipment acquired under Federal awards is in accordance with Federal requirements and if the awarding agency was compensated for its share of any equipment sold or converted to non-Federal use.
Audit (testing) procedures
To determine whether the above objectives are being achieved,
the following audit procedures most likely will be used.
Internal control
Proper internal control procedures provide an assurance that
grant awards are adequately managed and should reduce deficiencies found in
audits of the organization. An auditor may test internal controls in the equipment
management area in the following ways:
- By performing procedures to obtain
an understanding of internal control.
- By planning a test of internal
control and by performing the test as planned.
- By considering the results of the testing of internal control to determine the nature, timing, and extent of substantive tests of compliance.
An auditor may examine compliance in inventory management and disposition of
equipment and, in doing so, may adopt procedures similar to the following:
Inventory management of equipment
- Inquiring whether a physical
inventory of equipment acquired under Federal awards was taken in the last
two years and testing whether differences between the physical inventory and
equipment records were resolved.
- Identifying equipment acquired under
Federal awards during the audit period, and tracing selected purchases to
the property records to verify that the property records contain the
required information about the equipment.
- Selecting a sample of equipment identified as acquired under Federal awards from the property records and physically inspecting the equipment, including whether the equipment is appropriately safeguarded and maintained.
Dispositions of equipment
- Determining the amount of equipment
dispositions for the audit period and performing procedures to verify that
dispositions were properly classified between equipment acquired under
Federal awards and equipment otherwise acquired.
- For dispositions of equipment
acquired under Federal awards, performing procedures to verify that the
dispositions were properly reflected in the property records.
- For dispositions of equipment acquired under Federal awards with a current market value in excess of $5,000, testing whether the awarding agency was reimbursed for the appropriate Federal share.

Related Links
Federal requirements related to equipment for nonprofit
organizations
Federal requirements related to equipment for State, local and tribal governments
Related Program Instructions, Information Memorandums, and Departmental Appeals Board Decisions
| DAB Decision 1793 |
Prior approval for capital expenditures or change in
scope |
| DAB Decision 1625 |
Failure to obtain prior approval for purchase of
property |

|