"OUTCOMES ARE SIMPLY A STATEMENT of where we are… not
good or bad. What happens next?" The child outcomes system,
one of the Head Start mechanisms to increase the quality of services
to children and their families, is having a profound effect
on the way Head Start programs view the work they have done
and plan the work they will do. Outcome information allows
programs to make the subtle, yet powerful, shift from focusing
primarily on the activities that have been completed to focusing
on the results of those activities. Documentation and reporting
of the level of effort continues to be important. However, the
addition of child outcomes as part of the continuous improvement
process guides programs to ask, "So what?" As a result of
the investment of resources, have we made a difference in the
lives of their children we serve? What are the benefits they have
gained? What knowledge? What skills? What attitudes?
Beginning in 2000, the
pilot year for implementing a child outcomes system, an emphasis was placed
on two assessment
areas in Head Start: child assessment and self-assessment. As
stated in ACYF IM-HS-00-18, Head Start programs are
required to look at the effectiveness of the process by which
each child's comprehensive development is assessed as well as
the annual process by which programs reflect on the effectiveness
of their services and support systems. Furthermore, programs
have been required to link the two systems.
As with any system that is composed
of a number of interlocking and interacting parts, the linkage of the
child assessment
process and self-assessment is not isolated from the remainder of
the program. Other services and systems that are closely linked,
and therefore are impacted most by child outcomes, include curriculum,
record keeping, reporting, on-going monitoring, and
planning. A key thread throughout all of these services and systems
is the capacity of the program to manage information effectively
and efficiently and to use it to make informed decisions.
Using the Continuous Improvement Cycle
AS ILLUSTRATED in the Head Start Child
Outcomes Continuous Improvement Cycle (see Figure 1), planning is a key
initial aspect of the work done in Head Start. Short-and
long-term plans are developed for those served—
the children and their families— and for the program itself. All
Head Start services and the organizational systems that support
those services comprise a portion of the cycle involved with
activities. Put simply— what is being done with resources to fulfill
the mission of Head Start? Planning for activities and actually
doing the activities are critical but not sufficient for change to
occur.
The final portion of the continuous improvement cycle
focuses on answering the question, "Are we doing what we said
we would do and did those activities actually make positive
differences to those we serve?" By comparing what we planned
to do with what we actually did and then comparing all children's
progress in the eight domains of child development
throughout the year, we address a critical aspect of the continuous
improvement cycle— analysis of the information we have
gathered. A number of systems are in place that provide a
review of a program's work such as performance appraisals
of staff, parent satisfaction questionnaires, the Program
Information Report (PIR), Federal monitoring, and self assessment.
Objectively evaluating the gaps between the plans, the
actual accomplishments, and the degree of children's progress
during their Head Start experience brings us to the point of
reflecting about the self-assessment results. The three levels of
reflection are content, process, and premise. Content reflection
involves focusing on what has been done. Process reflection
examines how these activities have been done and the efficacy
in performing them. Premise reflection increases awareness of
why these particular activities were done in a certain manner.
(Mezirow and Associates 2000)
Like all systems, continuous improvement is
cyclical in nature. The activities and experiences during the previous
year
and the learning and wisdom gained through the self-assessment,
analysis, and reflective processes serve to better inform
the next planning process. The third assessment required of
Head Start programs, the community assessment, is also a significant influence
in the planning process. It focuses on whether
the program is being responsive to the needs of the participants—
the eligible children and their families.
An integral part of the outcomes paradigm is the development
of a logic model, linking certain activities with certain
results. Coupling the results of the program's child outcomes with current
research findings, each program must ask several questions during the initial
part of the planning process: What
do we need to keep doing? What do we need to do more of?
Less of? What do we need to add? What do we need to stop
doing? What do we need to modify in some way?
The child outcomes initiative
has created a powerful mechanism for Head Start programs
to continuously improve
the quality of their services to
children and their families. It
insures that the curriculum is
enhancing and supporting each
child's development in all
domains and that the ongoing
child assessment process provides
useful measures of each child's
development. In addition, the
effectiveness of the planning,
record-keeping, reporting, information
management, and self-assessment
systems continues to
improve in order to better support
the child outcomes system
and to respond to the information
provided by the data and its
analysis.

Regulatory Foundations for the Continuous Improvement Cycle
Head Start Program
Performance Standards
| 1304.51(a)(1) |
Systematic, ongoing program planning process— |
| 1304.51(a)(1)(i) and 1305.3 |
|
| 1304.51(a)(1)(ii) |
- goals and objectives consistent with community assessment, EHS/HS philosophy, self-assessment results
|
| 1304.51(a)(1)(iii) |
|
| 1304.51(g) |
Efficient, effective record-keeping systems |
| 1304.51(h) |
Efficient, effective reporting systems— |
| 1304.51(h)(1) |
- control quality
- maintain
accountability
- advise governing bodies and staff
|
| 1304.51(i) |
Program self-assessment and monitoring the effectiveness and progress— |
| 1304.51(i)(1) |
- in meeting goals and
objectives
- in implementing Federal regulations
|
| 1304.51(i)(2) |
Establish and implement ongoing monitoring procedures |
| ACYF-IM-HS-00-18 |
Purpose—
steps for incorporating child outcomes
in self-assessment resources on outcomes-based self-assessment
Goals—
- enhance
self-assessment and continuous improvement by incorporating
outcomes data
- improve and connect child assessment and self-assessment systems
Objectives include incorporating child outcome data into self-assessment
and continuous improvement process.
Step 7— Incorporating child outcome data
Data
analysis on patterns of child outcomes incorporated into self-assessment
system reported to
staff and governing bodies
Data considered in conjunction with other self-assessment findings—
- planning for program
improvements (training, mentoring, supervision)
- improvement in
curriculum
- reallocation of
resources
- involvement of
volunteers and partners
- supporting families
in enhancing learning and development
- planning for transitions into elementary schools
|
REFERENCES
Mezirow, J. & Associates. 2000.
Learning as transformation:
Critical perspectives on a
theory in progress. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Jeff Hoffman is Nebraska State
Liaison, Community
Development Institute/ Head
Start Quality Improvement
Center, Region VII.
T: 402-484-0265, E:
JefKHoffman@cs.com.
JoAn Knight Herren is Chief, T/TA
Branch, Head Start Bureau.
T: 202-205-8566,
E: jherren@acf.hhs.gov.
